Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2181 - 2189 of 2189
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 from 9 July 2007 to 13 July 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chile UNITED NATIONS A UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Z.W. v. Australia
Z.W. v. Australia CAT/C/62/D/669/2015 Communication number s : 669/2015 Author: Z.W. represented by counsel Frances Milne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 20 Mar 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/669/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2413/en-US
Zündel (2) v. Canada
Z ndel 2 v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005 Communication number s : 1341/2005 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: Request for interim JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1332/en-US
v. Kazakhstan
v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/52/D/497/2012 Communication number s : 497/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Kazakhstan Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/497/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1838/en-US
Özçelik et al. v. Türkiye
z elik et al. v. T rkiye CCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017 Communication number s : 2980/2017 Author: smet z elik Turgay Karaman and I.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country T rkiye Submission date 12 May 2017 Date of decision 26 Mar 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2918/en-US