Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 560 of 565
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Brazil
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Brazil CRC/C/88/D/105/2019 Communication number s : 105/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/105/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2953/en-US
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No.158/2017
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No.158/2017 ITA 24 00 163 2019 09 11 2020 02 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 11 September ESCcc-158-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-158-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Syndicat CFDT de la métallurgie de la Meuse v. France, Complaint No. 175/2019
Decision on the merits: Syndicat CFDT de la m tallurgie de la Meuse v. France Complaint No. 175/2019 FRA 24 00 163 2022 07 05 2022 11 30 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 5 July 2022 ESCcc-175-2019-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-175-2019-dmerits-en
Eglė Kusaitė v. Lithuania
Egl Kusait v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016 Communication number s : 2716/2016 Author: Egl Kusait Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 30 Oct 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2782/en-US
F.E.C. v. Spain
F.E.C. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020 Communication number s : 3810/2020 Author: F.E.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 19 Nov 2019 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3246/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND, Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, Evaluation Report, Belgium
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies Evaluation Report Belgium BEL 2019 12 06 2020 01 23 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 23 January 2020 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM BEL 2016 10 21 2017 01 11 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Belgian authorities to GRECOGrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine UKR ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 2017 03 10 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 Fourth Opinion on Ukraine adopted on 10 March 2017 Published on 5 March 2018 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Ukraine_public_en
Fourth report on Ireland
Fourth report on Ireland IRL 2012 12 05 2013 02 19 CRI 2013 1 ECRI REPORT ON IRELAND fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 5 December 2012 Published on 19 February 2013 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG ECRIIRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=IRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENG
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
M. E. N. v. Denmark
M. E. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011 Communication number s : 035/2011 Author: M. E. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Oct 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text of an JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1696/en-US
M. N. N. v. Denmark
M. N. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011 Communication number s : 033/2011 Author: M. N. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1695/en-US
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/95/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 95 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 07 May 2018 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/95/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3444/en-US
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US