Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1881 - 1898 of 1898
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.2 from 8 December 2012 to 14 December 2012 1 July 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Somalia United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y. M. v. Russian Federation
Y. M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/104/D/1858/2009 Communication number s : 1858/2009 Author: Y. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Oct 2007 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1858/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1453/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Yemen’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Arabic GENEVA 18 January 2019 Yemen s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 23 January 2019 in a meeting that will be webcast live . Yemen is one UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/media-advisories/2019/01/yemens-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Yrusta v. Argentina
Yrusta v. Argentina CED/C/10/D/1/2013 Communication number s : 001/2013 Author: Estela Deolinda Yrusta Alejandra del Valle Yrusta Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Argentina Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 JUTBCED/C/10/D/1/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2141/en-US
Yurich v. Chile
Yurich v. Chile CCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002 Communication number s : 1078/2002 Author: Norma Yurich Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Chile Submission date 10 Jul 2001 Date of decision 02 Nov 2005 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1233/en-US
Zambia’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 25 January 2023 Zambia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the fourth time on Monday 30 January 2023 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Zambia is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2023/01/zambias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Zambia’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 9 November 2017 Zambia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 13 November 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Zambia is one of the 14 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/zambias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Zimbabwe’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 21 January 2022 Zimbabwe s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 26 January 2022 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Zimbabwe is one of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2022/01/zimbabwes-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Černáková v. Slovakia
ern kov v. Slovakia CAT/C/72/D/890/2018 Communication number s : 890/2018 Author: Lucia ern kov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Slovakia Submission date 10 Jul 2018 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/72/D/890/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3337/en-US
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Burundi
v. Burundi CAT/C/52/D/503/2012 Communication number s : 503/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Burundi Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/503/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1839/en-US
v. Netherlands
v. Netherlands CCPR/C/82/D/903/1999 Communication number s : 903/1999 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Netherlands Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/903/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1785/en-US