Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2867
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A/HRC/37/15/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Japan - Addendum - Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/37/15/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 March 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan UPRA/HRC/37/15/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc3715add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-japan-addendum-views
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.L. v. Morocco
A.L. v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/805/2017 Communication number s : 805/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 05 Jan 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/805/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3350/en-US
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018 3207/2018 Communication number s : 3201/2018 3202/2018 3203/2018 3204/2018 3205/2018 3206/2018 3207/2018 3200/2018 Author: Mukhamadrasul Abdurasulov Osmonali Otamirzaev Bakhodir Zhalalov Abdurashit JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018-3207/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3645/en-US
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006 Communication number s : 1503/2006 Author: Otabek Akhadov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 18 Oct 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2011 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1610/en-US
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 Communication number s : 2052/2011 Author: Suyunbai Akmatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2031/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US