Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 4301
9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 18 December 2002 Entry into force : 22 June 2006 in accordance UNIV-9-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A.D. v. Netherlands
A.D. v. Netherlands CAT/C/23/D/96/1997 Communication number s : 096/1997 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Netherlands Submission date 07 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/23/D/96/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/221/en-US
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey TUR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to liberty and security / deportation and extradition protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: absence of clear legal provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37254
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate interference due to the prosecution of participants in peaceful assemblies and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50395
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 NULL 2017 06 12T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/AFG/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f8a1c4a3-5be3-4e9a-b9fc-86481147aa50
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
AKBAL v. Turkey
AKBAL v. Turkey TUR 16/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Breach of the adversarial principle in labour proceedings due to the administrative court s failure to communicate to the applicant one of the case file EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48769
AKYAZICI v. Turkey
AKYAZICI v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2010 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:41:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the non communication to the applicant the written opinion submitted by the Principal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35822
ANDRE v. France
ANDRE v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial before the Cour de Cassation due to the failure to communicate the report of the reporting judge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32745
ANGOLA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ANGOLA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/AGO/CO/1 NULL 2023 04 12T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/AGO/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 12 April 2023 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/AGO/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/806aab54-418a-4d88-8915-9fc3a5f0f094
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal PRT 21/09/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to communicate to the applicants several documents presented by the public prosecutor and/or the memoranda EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9917
ARPS v. Croatia
ARPS v. Croatia HRV 25/01/2017 00:00:00 08/06/2017 09:26:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the domestic court s failure to inform her or her lawyer of the appeal hearing and the breach of the principle of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46913
ASNAR v. France
ASNAR v. France FRA 18/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings before the Conseil d Etat because of the failure to communicate to the applicant pleadings from the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32883
ATYUKOV v. Russia
ATYUKOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to fair trial in the administrative offences proceedings notably on account of inability to cross examine key witnesses to have access to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52447