Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4161 - 4180 of 4301
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. North Macedonia
TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. North Macedonia MKD 28/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the Bitola Court of Appeal to communicate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60723
TAS v. Turkey
TAS v. Turkey TUR 24/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to communicate the prosecutors opinion to the applicants or their representatives in the context of review proceedings of lawfulness of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48113
TAS v. Turkey
TAS v. Turkey TUR 19/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified interference with freedom of expression on account of convictions under former Article 8 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30670
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TOGO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/TGO/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 27T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/TGO/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 27 August 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or Punishment UHRICAT/C/TGO/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8bf13a16-5379-44c2-a9d1-6c8e9ed5bb6e
TOGO : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
TOGO : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAT/OP/TGO/1 NULL 2017 04 28T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/TGO/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 28 April 2016 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: French English French UHRICAT/OP/TGO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8d0d2835-dcfd-4fd9-b681-7996939fdc69
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TUNISIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TUNISIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TUN/CO/6 NULL 2020 04 24T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TUN/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 24 April 2020 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TUN/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1b851558-e319-4cfc-a50d-8a6e2dd6a597
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 NULL 2017 04 20T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 International Covenant on Distr.: General 20 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TKM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b779aa9a-855e-4456-9133-f1d672f7ae90
TV VEST AS & ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway
TV VEST AS ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway NOR 11/03/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Imposition of a fine on a television broadcasting company and a political party by the State Media Authority for breaching EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-203
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband, Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011 Communication number s : 2069/2011 Author: Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov not represented by counsel Type of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1907/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
The prevention of ill-treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context of forced removals at borders
The prevention of ill treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context of forced removals at borders c cm 2023 03 30 CPT/Inf 2023 7 part The prevention of ill treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context CPTCPT/Inf(2023)07-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2023-7-part-en
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on France “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * “Transparency of party funding”
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on France Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of party funding FRA 2017 03 24 2017 09 28 Adoption: 24 March 2017 Public Publication: 28 September 2017 GrecoRC3 2017 9 Third GRECOGrecoRC3-2017-9-eng-France-Addendum-SecondRC3-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC3-2017-9-eng-France-Addendum-SecondRC3-PUBLIC