Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2291
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the delay of 14 years taken by the authorities to issue to a citizen of a member state of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33179
ASANOVIC v. Montenegro
ASANOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 20/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful detention of the applicant a practicing lawyer and long standing representative of an opposition media outlet on suspicion of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58343
AZIZ v. Cyprus
AZIZ v. Cyprus CYP 22/09/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Electoral rights / discrimination: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant as a member of the Turkish Cypriot community residing in the Government controlled area of Cyprus on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1996
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012 Communication number s : 2222/2012 Author: Ahmet Hudaybergenov represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2041/en-US
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012 Communication number s : 2225/2012 Author: Akmurad Nurjanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 15 Jul 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2222/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2135/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2179/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2019 00:00:00 08/03/2019 16:14:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to ensure the applicant s access to this daughter in the light of the child s mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51675
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece GRC 16/12/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant church s inability to take legal action as a result of civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22146
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972