Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 6229
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A.G.S. v. Spain
A.G.S. v. Spain CCPR/C/115/D/2626/2015 Communication number s : 2626/2015 Author: Diego Fern ndez Fern ndez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 114 Country Spain Submission date 21 Jun 2014 Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2626/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2085/en-US
A/HRC/37/15/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Japan - Addendum - Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/37/15/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 March 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan UPRA/HRC/37/15/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc3715add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-japan-addendum-views
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
A.M.M. v. Denmark
A.M.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014 Communication number s : 2415/2014 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jun 2014 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2231/en-US
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia LVA 12/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering a publishing company to pay compensation for damages for the publication in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31136
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/47/D/490/1992 Communication number s : 490/1992 Author: A.S. and L.S. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 47 Country Australia Submission date 26 Dec 1991 Date of decision 30 Mar 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/490/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/498/en-US
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
AGOUDIMOS & CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece
AGOUDIMOS CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece GRC 28/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Legislative interference during proceedings before the Court of Cassation which determined EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22178
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicant company s right of access to court from 1997 to 2005 because of the domestic courts refusal to examine its claim for damages on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3803
AHMET NIHAT ÖZSAN JOINT STOCK COMPANY v. Turkey
AHMET NIHAT ZSAN JOINT STOCK COMPANY v. Turkey TUR 09/05/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57989
AKTIVA DOO v. Serbia
AKTIVA DOO v. Serbia SRB 19/04/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate confiscation in 2005 of the applicant company s goods imported legally but in breach of record keeping regulations for which a fine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57723
AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland
AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland CHE 21/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the lack of adequate judicial scrutiny of freezing and confiscation procedures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5846
ALITHIA PUBLISHING COMPANY v. Cyprus
ALITHIA PUBLISHING COMPANY v. Cyprus CYP 11/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1990