Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 994
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012 Communication number s : 2201/2012 Author: Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2439/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Aouf v. Belgium
Aouf v. Belgium CCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001 Communication number s : 1010/2001 Author: Lass ad Aouf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belgium Submission date 22 May 2001 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1201/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BIH/CO/3 NULL 2021 11 10T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BIH/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 11 November 2021 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/BIH/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/302e3b03-9563-46be-9664-b160f052551b
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 57864/17 79087/17 55353/19 BAKHTADZE K. LEACH P. REMEZAITE R. GAVRON J. SAWYER J. CLIFFORD J. JOMARJIDZE N. ONIANI T. TABATADZE G. COJOCARIU C. LEVINE K. EVANS J. GEO 12/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221237
CASE OF A.H. KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.H. KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6222/10 MALIK LEGAL SOLICITORS LTD. GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Section 1 4 3 2 and 3 5 a of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 and 84 of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD000622210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108113
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA 37956/11 KUSAN L. HRV 1/8/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Sections 114 4 5 and 6 and 267 of the Family Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115868
CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 45889/18 BOKOV D. NOR 1/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120JUD004588918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215177
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF AÏT-MOUHOUB v. FRANCE
CASE OF A T MOUHOUB v. FRANCE 22924/93 N/A FRA 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards first complaint Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards second complaint Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002292493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58259