Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 3134
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 11 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c58ec660-a181-4765-ac2d-0d021de10d06
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Berlinov v. Belarus
Berlinov v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015 Communication number s : 2708/2015 Author: Petr Berlinov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3166/en-US
Blanco Abad v. Spain
Blanco Abad v. Spain CAT/C/20/D/59/1996 Communication number s : 059/1996 Author: Encarnaci n Blanco Abad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Spain Submission date 12 Feb 1996 Date of decision 14 May 1998 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/20/D/59/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/246/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
Brandsma v. Netherlands
Brandsma v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/977/2001 Communication number s : 977/2001 Author: R.P.C.W.M. Brandsma Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Oct 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/977/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/376/en-US
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/774/1997 Communication number s : 774/1997 Author: Robert Brok deceased and his surviving spouse Dagmar Brokova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/774/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/947/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
Burgess v. Australia
Burgess v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001 Communication number s : 1012/2001 Author: Brian John Lawrence Burgess Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2001 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1202/en-US
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016 Communication number s : 2753/2016 Author: C.L. and Z.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Mar 2016 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2484/en-US
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/279/2005 Communication number s : 279/2005 Author: C.T. and K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Sep 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/279/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/102/en-US