Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 35
CASE OF A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND 19958/92 N/A CHE 8/29/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Ordinance on Direct Federal Tax ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58178
CASE OF BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
CASE OF BARBER MESSEGU AND JABARDO v. SPAIN 10590/83 N/A ESP 12/6/1988 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objections ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD001059083https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57429
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM 12005/86 N/A BEL 10/30/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Judicial Code Articles 141 409 413 418 1107 1109 445 136 119 440 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1030JUD001200586https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57720
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM 10857/84 N/A BEL 7/7/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001085784https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57611
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF CRÉMIEUX v. FRANCE
CASE OF CR MIEUX v. FRANCE 11471/85 IMBACH C. FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001147185https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57805
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL 22600/93 PRT 4/21/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 e Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 76 136 440 86 162 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093 CASE OF DAUD v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58154
CASE OF DE SALVADOR TORRES v. SPAIN
CASE OF DE SALVADOR TORRES v. SPAIN 21525/93 N/A ESP 10/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 3 a Constitution Article 24 Criminal Code Articles 10 61 394 para. 4 399 528 529 para. 7 and 535 Code of Criminal Procedure Article 902 Constitutional Court ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1024JUD002152593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58061
CASE OF DELTA v. FRANCE
CASE OF DELTA v. FRANCE 11444/85 N/A FRA 12/19/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Damage financial award Costs and expenses claim dismissed Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 437 439 444 and 513 232 431 340 97 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1219JUD001144485https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57647
CASE OF DEWEER v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DEWEER v. BELGIUM 6903/75 N/A BEL 2/27/1980 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine art. 6 2 and 6 3 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Economic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1980:0227JUD000690375https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57469
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN 12747/87 N/A ESP FRA 6/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed incompetence Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 Franco andorran custom on the transfer to French ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0626JUD001274787https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57774
CASE OF FOUCHER v. FRANCE
CASE OF FOUCHER v. FRANCE 22209/93 N/A FRA 3/18/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Criminal Code Article R. 40 2 Code of Criminal Procedure ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0318JUD002220993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58017
CASE OF GALOVIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF GALOVI v. CROATIA 45512/11 MILANKOVI PODBRE NI KI T. HRV 8/31/2021 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 6 3 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 b Adequate facilities Adequate time Article 6 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0831JUD004551211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211592
CASE OF HOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27267/95 N/A GBR 2/18/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 No violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002726795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58913
CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA 16913/04 N/A LTU 7/19/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 445 440 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD001691304 SECOND SECTION CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA Application no. 16913/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 July ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD001691304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105685
CASE OF KADAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF KADAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA 12391/06 MUKHASHAVRIA L. VAKHTANGIDZE V. IMNAISHVILI V. GEO 5/14/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514JUD001239106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202435
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS 12228/86 N/A NLD 10/25/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Netherlands Criminal Code Article 37 448 228 459 456 220 307 351 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001222886https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57637
CASE OF KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA 59696/00 KOSTROMINA K. RUS 10/26/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Violation of Art. 3 in respect of inadequate medical treatment in the detention facility Not necessary to examine the other complaints under Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD005969600https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77692
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY 26772/95 N/A ITA 4/6/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill treatment Violation of Art. 3 with regard to lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of transfer ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406JUD002677295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58559