Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1185
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A.K. v. Latvia
A.K. v. Latvia LVA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of private life: Procedural shortcomings in compensation proceedings on account of the applicant s gynaecologist s alleged medical negligence in antenatal care. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31192
A.N. v. Switzerland
A.N. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/742/2016 Communication number s : 742/2016 Author: A.N. represented by counsel Centre Suisse pour la D fense des Droits des Migrants Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2447/en-US
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Freedom of religion and freedom of association: Breach on account of the banning of the applicant organisations symbols followed by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58677
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia LVA 12/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering a publishing company to pay compensation for damages for the publication in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31136
A.S. v. Poland
A.S. v. Poland POL 23/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand under a bill of indictment and its prolongation on the basis of a fax from the Supreme Court lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17841
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ACAR v. Turkey
ACAR v. Turkey TUR 30/04/2003 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:15:36 Case Description: Protection of property: excessive delays in administrative or judicial proceedings to determine compensation and gap of default interest rate in comparison with inflation rate. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36647
ADEM YILMAZ DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ADEM YILMAZ DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 15/09/2010 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:08:40 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to cancellation of property titles in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34895
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
AKVARDAR v. Turkey
AKVARDAR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s inability to obtain the compensation due for expropriation of land which had belonged to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54933