Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 NULL 2022 12 05T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 5 December 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/AUS/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/43210655-30d4-4aeb-9552-debfec1cc4ab
CASE OF I.S. v. GREECE
CASE OF I.S. v. GREECE 19165/20 ANAGNOSTAKIS A. GRC 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD001916520https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224777
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ILHAN v. TURKEY 22277/93 N/A TUR 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002227793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58734
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (REVISION)
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM REVISION 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 1/28/2000 12:00:00 AM Revision rejected Pensions Appeal Tribunals Scotland Rules 1981 Rule 6 445 13 7 136 451 429 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0128JUD002182593 FIRST SECTION CASE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0128JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58452
CASE OF ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32555/96 WELCH J. GBR 10/19/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 6 or 14 P1 1 No violation of Art. 13 6 or 13 P1 1 Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1019JUD003255596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70662
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : AUSTRALIA
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : AUSTRALIA CAT/C/AUS/CO/3 NULL 2008 05 22T06:00:00 CAT UNITED NATIONS CAT Distr. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or GENERAL Degrading Treatment or Punishment CAT/C/AUS/CO/3 22 UHRICAT/C/AUS/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b058bc8f-d059-4094-a125-7bd2a758c70d
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE: AUSTRALIA
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE: AUSTRALIA CCPR/C/AUS/CO/5 NULL 2009 05 07T06:00:00 CCPR UNITED NATIONS CCPR Distr. GENERAL International covenant UHRICCPR/C/AUS/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e77c83d8-e148-40b3-bd41-1326fd68d445
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION : AUSTRALIA
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION : AUSTRALIA CERD/C/AUS/CO/15 17 NULL 2010 09 13T06:00:00 CERD United Nations UHRICERD/C/AUS/CO/15-17https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9e8368aa-77e0-4507-a458-84ea9aff1483
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia CCPR/C/AUS/CO/6 NULL 2017 12 01T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Australia 1.The Committee considered the sixth periodic report of Australia UHRICCPR/C/AUS/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c09dc287-c4db-460e-ae7d-c645bf1f350a
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING, MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM A/HRC/4/18/Add.2 NULL 2007 05 11T06:00:00 SR Housing UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly UHRIA/HRC/4/18/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f18b8e41-15bd-4bf9-a184-713ff4c8f91c
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : AUSTRALIA
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : AUSTRALIA A/HRC/17/10 NULL 2011 03 23T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/17/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda UHRIA/HRC/17/10https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3708dd6f-6496-456e-87b4-be90b398d75e
Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/18/Add.2 from 31 July 2006 to 15 August 2006 11 May 2007 Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living and on the right to non discrimination in this context Australia UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/18/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f18%2fAdd.2&Lang=en