Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3673
A. H. v. Sweden
A. H. v. Sweden CAT/C/35/D/250/2004 Communication number s : 250/2004 Author: A.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Jul 2004 Date of decision 15 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/250/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/121/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016 Communication number s : 2757/2016 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3273/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
Allen v. Jamaica
Allen v. Jamaica CCPR/C/50/D/332/1988 Communication number s : 332/1988 Author: Devon Allen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Jamaica Submission date 20 Oct 1988 Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: A decision under rule 86 was JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/332/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/535/en-US
Althammer et al. v. Austria
Althammer et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/74/D/803/1998 Communication number s : 803/1998 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Austria Submission date 10 Dec 1996 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/803/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/960/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
BELASHEV v. Russia
BELASHEV v. Russia RUS 05/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to a public hearing in criminal proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to properly motivate their decisions to held the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13765
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY 9042/04 BERGE H. NOR 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY Application no. 9042/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 May 2007 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80744
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY (No. 2)
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY No. 2 16468/05 AABO EVENSEN O. K. NOR 1/17/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD001646805 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY No. 2 Application no. 16468/05 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD001646805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-84471