Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1158
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
Abbahah v. Morocco
Abbahah v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/871/2018 Communication number s : 871/2018 Author: Sidi Abdallah Abbahah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 09 May 2018 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/72/D/871/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3120/en-US
Abdelli v. Tunisia
Abdelli v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/188/2001 Communication number s : 188/2001 Author: Imed Abdelli Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 29 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/188/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/167/en-US
Abdussamatov et al. v. Kazakhstan
Abdussamatov et al. v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/47/D/444/2010 Communication number s : 444/2010 Author: Toirjon Abdussamatov and 28 other complainants Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 47 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 24 Dec 2010 Date of JUTBCAT/C/47/D/444/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/47/en-US
Ad hoc Report on Slovenia (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Slovenia Rule 34 SVN 2019 12 06 2020 02 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 February 2020 Greco AdHocRep 2019 3 Ad hoc Report on SLOVENIA Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Slovenia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep%282019%293-FINAL-eng-Slovenia-PUBLIC
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/450/2011 Communication number s : 450/2011 Author: Ali Fadel represented by counsel Tarig Hassan of Advokatur Kanonengasse Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Feb JUTBCAT/C/53/D/450/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2035/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 06 07T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BLR/CO/5 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 7 June 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/36feac0c-37fb-4702-8666-4c3cc1c7b33b
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
Boyer v. Canada
Boyer v. Canada CCPR/C/95/D/1774/2008 Communication number s : 1774/2008 Author: Jean Marc Boyer Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Canada Submission date 03 Mar 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1774/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1472/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US