Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1409
52th Session of the Board of Trustees on the Voluntary Fund for Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights and 14th of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of UPR
Opening remarks by Ms Michelle Bachelet United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 1 June 2021 Dear colleagues It is a pleasure to address this meeting connecting current and former Members of the Board of Trustees. It is a remarkable occasion for UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2021/06/52th-session-board-trustees-voluntary-fund-technical-cooperation-field-human
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.D. v. Spain
A.D. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/14/2017 Communication number s : 014/2017 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 17 Mar 2017 Date of decision 01 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/80/D/14/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2508/en-US
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 NULL 2022 12 05T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 5 December 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/AUS/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/43210655-30d4-4aeb-9552-debfec1cc4ab
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 NULL 2019 10 15T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 15 October 2019 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/AUS/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/61f3fd5a-723c-4dfe-b63e-38d731efb214
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2018 04 18T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BGD/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 18 April 2018 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/94146787-dedc-4ee2-8cd7-9d205c6878a1