Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2830
52th Session of the Board of Trustees on the Voluntary Fund for Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights and 14th of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of UPR
Opening remarks by Ms Michelle Bachelet United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 1 June 2021 Dear colleagues It is a pleasure to address this meeting connecting current and former Members of the Board of Trustees. It is a remarkable occasion for UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2021/06/52th-session-board-trustees-voluntary-fund-technical-cooperation-field-human
A.A. v. Sweden
A.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/72/D/918/2019 Communication number s : 918/2019 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 2019 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/72/D/918/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3078/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.G. v. Netherlands
A.G. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/3052/2017 Communication number s : 3052/2017 Author: A.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 Oct 2017 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3052/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3258/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 NULL 2019 10 15T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 15 October 2019 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/AUS/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/61f3fd5a-723c-4dfe-b63e-38d731efb214
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland CERD/C/91/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 053/2013 Author: Benon Pjetri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: Opinion non JUTBCERD/C/91/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2186/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
CAMBODIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAMBODIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/KHM/CO/2 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/KHM/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 27 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/KHM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/37e881bf-5024-4e67-addb-71ca8cf28a25