Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 103
A.K. et al. v. Albania
A.K. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014 Communication number s : 2438/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Albania Submission date 04 Jul 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2890/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND 686/12 SLUPSKA UCZKIEWICZ B. POL 3/21/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD000068612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172103
CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3383/06 SEELEY N. GBR 1/8/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000338306 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000338306https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90398
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. GBR 11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 238 343 100 258 369 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89309
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 17101/90 N/A GBR 9/21/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Companies Act 1985 Sections 432 para. 2 434 436 437 para. 3 c 14 128 445 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57890
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2010/06 WHITFIELD L. GBR 6/17/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 Child Support Act 1991 445 7 40 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000201006 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000201006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86980
CASE OF KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13881/02 SALIM PATEL GBR 11/16/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD001388102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67468
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS 73797/01 TRIANTAFYLLIDES M. CLERIDES C. EFSTATHIOU E. ANGELIDES A. VRAHIMI E. CLERIDES L. EMMERSON B. MULLER M. CYP 12/15/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD007379701https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71671
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 18766/11 36030/11 SCHUSTER A. D AMICO M. CLARA M. PITEA C. ITA 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156265