Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 61
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJEČNIČKI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJE NI KI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA 36701/09 POSAVEC S. HRV 11/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148181
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 58216/12 Weiss A. AUT 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour Article 4 Positive obligations Article 4 1 Trafficking in human beings No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170388
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 2)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 2 18978/91 N/A FRA 9/26/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits victim Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0926JUD001897891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58077
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA 25965/04 CHURKINA L. M. CYP RUS 1/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Request for strike out rejected Preliminary objection dismissed ratione loci Preliminary objection joined to the merits ratione materiae Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD002596504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96549
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE 73316/01 CLEMENT H. FRA 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected victim Violation of Art. 4 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Code former Articles 225 13 225 14 Information ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891
Carlos Moreno Zamora et al. v. Mexico
Carlos Moreno Zamora et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/127/D/2760/2016 Communication number s : 2760/2016 Author: Carlos Moreno Zamora Mar a Enriqueta P rez Barrera and Areli Moreno P rez on their own behalf and on behalf of Jes s Israel Moreno P rez their missing JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2760/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2802/en-US
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
“I Elpida” — The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs, and Stylianos Kalamiotis v. Greece
I Elpida The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs and Stylianos Kalamiotis v. Greece CCPR/C/118/D/2242/2013 Communication number s : 2242/2013 Author: I Elpida The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2242/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2180/en-US
India’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 1 May 2017 India s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Thursday 4 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. India is one of the 14 States to UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/indias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US