Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 32
CASE OF ABDURAKHMANOVA AND ABDULGAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABDURAKHMANOVA AND ABDULGAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA 41437/10 EHRAC/MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 9/22/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922JUD004143710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157372
CASE OF ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKICI v. TURKEY 23657/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 applicant s brother No violation of Art. 3 applicant Violation of Art. 5 Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002365794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58282
CASE OF ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8225/78 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 6 1 Mental Health Act 1959 Section 141 448 228 307 566 150 340 97 232 431 445 136 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000822578https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57425
CASE OF ASKHABOVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ASKHABOVA v. RUSSIA 54765/09 MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 4/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD005476509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118601
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM 9106/80 N/A BEL 2/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 5 4 Just satisfaction reserved Children s and Young Persons Welfare Act of 8 April 1965 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0229JUD000910680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57445
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA 13308/87 N/A AUT 8/25/1993 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 No violation of Art. 10 Law on Administrative Offences Sections 35 para. 3 36 para. 1 149 148 201 265 331 570 423 448 228 405 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0825JUD001330887 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0825JUD001330887https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57821
CASE OF CIULLA v. ITALY
CASE OF CIULLA v. ITALY 11152/84 N/A ITA 2/22/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 5 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0222JUD001115284https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57460
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 5100/71 5101/71 5102/71 5354/72 5370/72 N/A NLD 6/8/1976 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 2 No violation of Art. 6 3 b No violation of Art. 6 3 c No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:0608JUD000510071https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57479
CASE OF FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FOX CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 12244/86 12245/86 12383/86 N/A GBR 8/30/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 and 13 Just satisfaction reserved 1978 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0830JUD001224486https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57721
CASE OF GIORGI NIKOLAISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF GIORGI NIKOLAISHVILI v. GEORGIA 37048/04 GIOSHVILI M. GEO 1/13/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 1 c Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 8 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003704804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90590
CASE OF IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5310/71 N/A GBR 1/18/1978 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 14 5 Just satisfaction not applied Civil authorities Special Powers Act Northern Ireland 96 95 285 489 276 293 430 343 100 350 89 90 192 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1978:0118JUD000531071https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57506
CASE OF K. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF K. v. AUSTRIA 16002/90 N/A AUT 6/2/1993 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 152 153 160 448 228 445 149 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0602JUD001600290 In the case of K. v. Austria The European Court of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0602JUD001600290https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57830
CASE OF KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)
CASE OF KEMMACHE v. FRANCE No. 3 17621/91 N/A FRA 11/24/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 141 144 148 215 448 228 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001762191 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF KEMMACHE v. FRANCE No. 3 Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001762191https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57894
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS 12228/86 N/A NLD 10/25/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Netherlands Criminal Code Article 37 448 228 459 456 220 307 351 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001222886https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57637
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM 11613/85 N/A BEL 9/24/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 14 128 448 228 456 220 135 481 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57742
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY 24276/94 N/A TUR 5/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 complaint in respect of applicant s son Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0525JUD002427694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58198
CASE OF LUBERTI v. ITALY
CASE OF LUBERTI v. ITALY 9019/80 N/A ITA 2/23/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Criminal Code Articles 204 222 445 406 448 228 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0223JUD000901980https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72567