Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6661 - 6680 of 6687
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/38/48/Add.2 from 10 July 2017 to 19 July 2017 8 May 2018 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Peru United Nations A/HRC/38/48/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 UNSPA/HRC/38/48/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f38%2f48%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/41/43/Add.2 from 2 July 2018 to 11 July 2018 21 May 2019 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Kenya United Nations A/HRC/41/43/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General UNSPA/HRC/41/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f41%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/53/24/Add.1 from 31 October 2022 to 11 November 2022 21 April 2023 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Liberia United Nations A/HRC/53/24/Add.1 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/53/24/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f53%2f24%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Russia
X v. Russia RUS 20/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of the applicant s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital between 24 April and 20 May 2014 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49659
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
Y.S. v. Russia
Y.S. v. Russia RUS 30/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of a person s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital due to the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57213
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia
Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia CCPR/C/76/D/876/1999 Communication number s : 876/1999 Author: L. Yama and N. Khalid Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Slovakia Submission date 02 Aug 1999 Date of decision 31 Oct 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/876/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/934/en-US
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014 Communication number s : 2410/2014 Author: Yury Orkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2781/en-US
Z.H. v. Sweden
Z.H. v. Sweden CRPD/C/25/D/58/2019 Communication number s : 58/2019 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Apr 2019 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/58/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3067/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland CAT/C/54/D/468/2011 Communication number s : 468/2011 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Jun 2011 Date of decision 05 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/468/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1981/en-US
ZAGORODNIY v. Ukraine
ZAGORODNIY v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful restriction of the right to a free choice of defence counsel arising from the continuous uncertainty in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26450