Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 70
1. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 1. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Paris 9 December 1948 1 Entry into force : 12 January 1951 in accordance with article XIII. Registration : 12 January UNIV-1https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-1&chapter=4&clang=_en
13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families New York 18 December 1990 Entry into force : 1 July 2003 in accordance with UNIV-13https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012 Communication number s : 2212/2012 Author: Andrei Sannikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Jul 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2488/en-US
CASE OF K.I. v. FRANCE
CASE OF K.I. v. FRANCE 5560/19 ZIND F. FRA 4/15/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Russia Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD000556019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209520
CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25904/07 MOLE N. GBR 7/17/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 350 193 492 449 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002590407 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. 25904/07 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 July ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002590407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87458
CEDAW 58TH SESSION: INDIA - CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CEDAW 58TH SESSION: INDIA CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4 5 NULL 2014 07 24T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4 5 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 24 July 2014 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e5de6de9-5afa-439b-831f-f57876cf0466
Chelliah v. Australia
Chelliah v. Australia CAT/C/34/D/211/2002 Communication number s : 211/2002 Author: Prashanthan Anton Chelliah Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 34 Country Australia Submission date 07 Jun 2002 Date of decision 03 May 2005 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/211/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/131/en-US
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
G.W.J. v. Australia
G.W.J. v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/856/2017 Communication number s : 856/2017 Author: G.W.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 07 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/856/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3347/en-US
Gnaneswaran v. Australia
Gnaneswaran v. Australia CCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018 Communication number s : 3212/2018 Author: Thileepan Gnaneswaran Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2018 Date of decision 27 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3155/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Nauru, Rwanda and Nepal
Human Rights Council MORNING 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Nauru Rwanda and Nepal. Marlene Moses Permanent Representative of Nauru to the United Nations in New York said the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-nauru-rwanda
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom
Human Rights Council holds Panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 21 September 2012 Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms and on the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day after UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-holds-panel-discussion-nelson-mandela-international-day
K.N. v. Australia
K.N. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/649/2015 Communication number s : 649/2015 Author: K.N. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 06 Jan 2015 Date of decision 23 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/649/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2201/en-US
Manuel v. New Zealand
Manuel v. New Zealand CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005 Communication number s : 1385/2005 Author: Benjamin Manuel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country New Zealand Submission date 06 Apr 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1379/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON CONTEMPORARY FORMS OF RACISM, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, XENOPHOBIA AND RELATED INTOLERANCE, GITHU MUIGAI ADDENDUM MISSION TO THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON CONTEMPORARY FORMS OF RACISM RACIAL DISCRIMINATION XENOPHOBIA AND RELATED INTOLERANCE GITHU MUIGAI ADDENDUM MISSION TO THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES A/HRC/14/43/Add.3 NULL 2010 05 31T06:00:00 SR Racism United Nations UHRIA/HRC/14/43/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6bf84d89-ca17-4983-affd-7ac7b52681ca