Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3842
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ACHLEITNER v. Austria
ACHLEITNER v. Austria AUT 23/01/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings on civil rights and obligations and criminal charges before administrative authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-955
AGOSTINHO v. Portugal
AGOSTINHO v. Portugal PRT 03/10/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9549
AZEVEDO MOREIRA v. Portugal
AZEVEDO MOREIRA v. Portugal PRT 30/05/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9511
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Ahmet Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012 Communication number s : 2222/2012 Author: Ahmet Hudaybergenov represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2222/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2041/en-US
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan
Akmurad Nurjanov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012 Communication number s : 2225/2012 Author: Akmurad Nurjanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 15 Jul 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2225/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2222/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2135/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2179/en-US
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010 Communication number s : 2019/2010 Author: Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2030/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal PRT 04/04/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9493
BENTO DA MOTA v. Portugal
BENTO DA MOTA v. Portugal PRT 28/09/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9461
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US