Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 69
A.E. v. Sweden
A.E. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/3300/2019 Communication number s : 3300/2019 Author: A.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3300/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2830/en-US
A.M. v. Switzerland
A.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/25/D/144/1999 Communication number s : 144/1999 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Aug 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/25/D/144/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/201/en-US
C. N. v. Denmark
C. N. v. Denmark CAT/C/57/D/709/2015 Communication number s : 709/2015 Author: C. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No Future sessions Country Denmark Submission date 28 Oct 2015 Date of decision 29 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/709/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2121/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND 889/19 43987/16 SURBER B. CHE 11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD000088919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206153
CASE OF EZEH AND CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EZEH AND CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 39665/98 40086/98 N/A GBR 10/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Justice Act 1991 section ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD003966598https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61333
CASE OF KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 32504/11 ENDRESSEN B. NOR 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Expulsion Turkey 451 628 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003250411 FIRST SECTION CASE OF KAPLAN AND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003250411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145733
CASE OF KHAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF KHAN v. GERMANY 38030/12 GABSA E. DEU 4/23/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Expulsion Conditional Pakistan 451 628 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD003803012 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KHAN v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD003803012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153909
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MCCARTNEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MCCARTNEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34575/04 MADDEN FINUCANE GBR 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 lack of independence of the investigating body during the initial stages of the investigation Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003457504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83480
CASE OF MCGRATH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MCGRATH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34651/04 MADDEN FINUCANE GBR 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 lack of independence of the investigating body during the initial stages of the investigation Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003465104https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83482
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF O'DOWD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF O DOWD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34622/04 MADDEN FINUCANE GBR 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 lack of independence of the investigating body during the initial stages of the investigation Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003462204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83472
CASE OF REAVEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF REAVEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34640/04 MADDEN FINUCANE GBR 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 lack of independence of the investigating body during the initial stages of the investigation Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003464004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83462
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUM
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUM 70055/10 MICHOLT S. BEL 2/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD007005510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141668
CASE OF T.C.E. v. GERMANY
CASE OF T.C.E. v. GERMANY 58681/12 TEGEBAUER I. J. DEU 3/1/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Sections 59 and 60a of the Residence Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD005868112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181177
CASE OF V.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 49734/12 LAWRENCE LUPIN SOLICITORS GBR 9/1/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention 448 220 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0901JUD004973412 FIRST SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0901JUD004973412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165756
E.O.J., O.O.J., F.I.J., E.J. v. Sweden
E.O.J. O.O.J. F.I.J. E.J. v. Sweden CRPD/C/18/D/28/2015 Communication number s : 028/2015 Author: O.O.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/28/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2391/en-US