Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/77/1980 Communication number s : 077/1980 Author: Samuel Lichtensztejn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 30 Sep 1980 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/77/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/315/en-US
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay CCPR/C/13/D/52/1979 Communication number s : 052/1979 Author: Delia Saldias de Lopez alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 13 Country Uruguay Submission date 06 Jun 1979 Date of decision 29 Jul 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/13/D/52/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/298/en-US
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/106/1981 Communication number s : 106/1981 Author: Mabel Pereira Montero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 29 Aug 1981 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/106/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/396/en-US
Singh v. France
Singh v. France CCPR/C/102/D/1876/2009 Communication number s : 1876/2009 Author: Ranjit Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country France Submission date 15 Dec 2008 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1876/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1212/en-US