Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1421 - 1440 of 1564
Koi v. Portugal
Koi v. Portugal CCPR/C/73/D/925/2000 Communication number s : 925/2000 Author: Wan Kuok Koi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Portugal Submission date 15 Dec 1999 Date of decision 22 Oct 2001 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/925/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/950/en-US
Korneenko v. Belarus
Korneenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1226/2003 Communication number s : 1226/2003 Author: Viktor Korneenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 05 Aug 2003 Date of decision 20 Jul 2012 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1432/en-US
Kristjánsson v. Iceland
Kristj nsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/78/D/951/2000 Communication number s : 951/2000 Author: Bjorn Kristj nsson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Iceland Submission date 06 Jul 2000 Date of decision 16 Jul 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/951/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/359/en-US
Kuznetsov et al. v. Belarus
Kuznetsov et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1976/2010 Communication number s : 1976/2010 Author: Petr Kuznetsov et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 14 Mar 2010 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1976/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1852/en-US
L.H., L.H., D.A, C.D. and A.F. v. France
L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. v. France CRC/C/85/D/79/2019 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 Author: L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 13 Mar 2019 Date of decision 30 JUTBCRC/C/85/D/79/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3587/en-US
Laing v. Australia
Laing v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/901/1999 Communication number s : 901/1999 Author: Deborah Joy Laing Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 30 Nov 1999 Date of decision 09 Jul 2004 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/901/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1091/en-US
Larrañaga v. Philippines
Larra aga v. Philippines CCPR/C/87/D/1421/2005 Communication number s : 1421/2005 Author: Francisco Juan Larra aga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Philippines Submission date 15 Aug 2005 Date of decision 24 Jul 2006 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1421/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1294/en-US
Lars-Anders Ågren et al. v. Sweden
Lars Anders gren et al. v. Sweden CERD/C/102/D/54/2013 Communication number s : 54/2013 Author: Lars Anders gren et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Sep 2013 Date of decision 18 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/102/D/54/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3021/en-US
Lederbauer v. Austria
Lederbauer v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006 Communication number s : 1454/2006 Author: Wolfgang Lederbauer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 2005 Date of decision 13 Jul 2007 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1385/en-US
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010 Communication number s : 2016/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2028/en-US
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2114/2011 Communication number s : 2114/2011 Author: Leonid Sudalenko not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Sep 2011 Date of decision 22 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2114/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1919/en-US
Love et al. v. Australia
Love et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/77/D/983/2001 Communication number s : 983/2001 Author: John K. Love William L. Bone William J. Craig and Peter B. Ivanoff Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Australia Submission date 01 Aug 1997 JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/983/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1044/en-US
Lukyanchik v. Belarus
Lukyanchik v. Belarus CCPR/C/97/D/1392/2005 Communication number s : 1392/2005 Author: Valery Lukyanchik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 97 Country Belarus Submission date 07 Apr 2005 Date of decision 21 Oct 2009 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1392/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1539/en-US
Lula da Silva v. Brazil
Lula da Silva v. Brazil CCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 INITIAL PROCEEDINGS Communication number s : 2841/2016 Author: Luiz In cio Lula da Silva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Brazil Submission date 28 Jul 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 (INITIAL PROCEEDINGS)https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3115/en-US
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012 Communication number s : 2214/2012 Author: John Jacques Lumbala Tshidika Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 13 Aug JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2046/en-US
M.S.S. v. Greece
M.S.S. v. Greece GRC 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1219
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
MCFARLANE v. Ireland
MCFARLANE v. Ireland IRL 10/09/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive length of both criminal and civil proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy for these problems violations of Articles 6 1 and 13 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1944
MEXICO: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
MEXICO: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/MEX/2 NULL 2018 09 20T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/MEX/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 20 September 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/MEX/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/cb2738b8-3696-414f-97c0-f98bec47c386
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012 Communication number s : 2221/2012 Author: Mahmud Hudaybergenov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2062/en-US