Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1101 - 1120 of 1989
JAPAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
JAPAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/JPN/CO/6 NULL 2014 08 19T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/JPN/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 20 August 2014 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/JPN/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0389f3bf-8946-4477-9192-90bb1d6589fb
JULIN v. Estonia
JULIN v. Estonia EST 29/08/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment on account of confinement to a restraint bed in Tartu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3043
Jaona v. Madagascar
Jaona v. Madagascar CCPR/C/24/D/132/1982 Communication number s : 132/1982 Author: Monja Jaona Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Madagascar Submission date 30 Dec 1982 Date of decision 01 Apr 1985 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/132/1982https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/432/en-US
Jensen v. Denmark
Jensen v. Denmark CAT/C/32/D/202/2002 Communication number s : 202/2002 Author: Helle Jensen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 32 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jan 2002 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/32/D/202/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/150/en-US
Johar v. Norway
Johar v. Norway CCPR/C/132/D/2854/2016 Communication number s : 2854/2016 Author: Islam Johar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Norway Submission date 06 Apr 2016 Date of decision 07 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2854/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3194/en-US
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand CAT/C/62/D/672/2015 Communication number s : 672/2015 Author: John Alfred Vogel represented by counsel Tony Ellis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country New Zealand Submission date 05 Jan 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/672/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2404/en-US
Jones v. Jamaica
Jones v. Jamaica CCPR/C/62/D/585/1994 Communication number s : 585/1994 Author: Tony Jones Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1994 Date of decision 06 Apr 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/585/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/368/en-US
Judge v. Canada
Judge v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/829/1998 Communication number s : 829/1998 Author: Roger Judge Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 07 Aug 1998 Date of decision 05 Aug 2003 Comment: The exact date of the JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/829/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1063/en-US
Juveniles deprived of their liberty under criminal legislation
Juveniles deprived of their liberty under criminal legislation fa 2015 01 21 2015 01 21 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2015 1 part rev1 Juveniles deprived of their liberty CPTCPT/Inf(2015)1-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2015-1-part-en
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium CRC/C/89/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: K.K. and R.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belgium Submission date 30 Jan 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/89/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2995/en-US
KAGANOVSKYY v. Ukraine
KAGANOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 15/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns the confinement for a period of ten days in 2017 in the enhanced intensive supervision unit of the Kyiv Psychoneurological Residential Institution where EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62266
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KAN v. Turkey
KAN v. Turkey TUR 02/02/2016 00:00:00 28/10/2016 19:22:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Confinement to a disciplinary room as a sanction imposed on the applicant by his military superiors. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5680
KAZAKHSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
KAZAKHSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/KAZ/CO/2 NULL 2019 03 29T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/KAZ/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 29 March 2019 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/KAZ/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/83763d6d-bee1-4427-95e0-2d2245572d23
KAZAKHSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
KAZAKHSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/KAZ/CO/3 NULL 2014 12 11T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/KAZ/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 December 2014 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/KAZ/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/91674473-d88a-4f27-9929-375f3ade655d
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/04/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Suicide of a mother s mentally ill son in prison due to lack of adequate care and due to disciplinary segregation measures imposed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2462
KHIDER v. France
KHIDER v. France FRA 09/10/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and conditions of detention: Classified as a prisoner requiring special supervision the applicant was subjected to repeated transfers from one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33283
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KOROVINY v. Russia
KOROVINY v. Russia RUS 27/05/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of Article 3 on account of the poor material conditions of the first applicant s confinement in 2010 2012 in the Kazan Specialist Psychiatric Hospital under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14058
KOVYAZIN v. Russia
KOVYAZIN v. Russia RUS 29/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Confinement of the applicants in a metal cage in the courtroom during criminal proceedings against them. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49655