Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1961 - 1980 of 1989
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Iceland
X v. Iceland CCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016 Communication number s : 2818/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Iceland Submission date 24 Feb 2016 Date of decision 22 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos Manuel Santos JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3289/en-US
X. v. Republic of Korea
X. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009 Communication number s : 1908/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Oct 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1809/en-US
X v. Russia
X v. Russia RUS 20/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of the applicant s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital between 24 April and 20 May 2014 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49659
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X v. Turkey
X v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection against discrimination / protection against ill treatment: Sustained discrimination and inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the homosexual applicant s detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37196
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
Y.S. v. Russia
Y.S. v. Russia RUS 30/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of a person s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital due to the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57213
YANKOV v. Bulgaria
YANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/03/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Shaving of a detainee s head disciplinary punishment for insulting officials in the draft manuscript of a book EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14291
YAVUZ SELIM GULER v. Turkey
YAVUZ SELIM GULER v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:45:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Administrative restrictions and room confinement imposed as a disciplinary sanction by the applicant s military superior and not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36832
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana CCPR/C/62/D/676/1996 Communication number s : 676/1996 Author: Abdool Saleem Yasseen and Noel Thomas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Guyana Submission date 02 Feb 1996 Date of decision 30 Mar 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/676/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/836/en-US
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US
Z.H. v. Australia
Z.H. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010 Communication number s : 1957/2010 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1652/en-US
Zündel (2) v. Canada
Z ndel 2 v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005 Communication number s : 1341/2005 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: Request for interim JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1332/en-US