Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 1954
Belova et al. v. Belarus
Belova et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/131/D/2891/2016 Communication number s : 2891/2016 Author: Galina Belova Leonid Sudalenko and Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2016 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2891/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3201/en-US
Belsky v. Belarus
Belsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/134/D/2755/2016 Communication number s : 2755/2016 Author: Yury Belsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Jan 2016 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2755/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3076/en-US
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014 Communication number s : 2441/2014 Author: Berik Zhagiparov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 25 Oct 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2553/en-US
Berlinov v. Belarus
Berlinov v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015 Communication number s : 2708/2015 Author: Petr Berlinov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3166/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
CAMEROON: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAMEROON: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/CMR/CO/5 NULL 2017 12 18T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/CMR/CO/5 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 December 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or Punishment UHRICAT/C/CMR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/65df6574-581c-424d-be37-652cb8dc8abf
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND 56925/08 PONCET C. CHE 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 235 326 579 379 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.B. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145457
CASE OF A.-M.V. v. FINLAND
CASE OF A. M.V. v. FINLAND 53251/13 SILLANPAA H. FIN 3/23/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0323JUD005325113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172134
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA 25794/13 28151/13 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 11/22/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168780
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF ŞAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AH N ALPAY v. TURKEY 16538/17 CAGIL F. TUR 3/20/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD001653817https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181866
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET H SREV ALTAN v. TURKEY 13252/17 ALBUGA ALIKU U F. TUR 4/13/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413JUD001325217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209444
CASE OF AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET ZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21689/93 N/A TUR 4/6/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect No violation of Article 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406JUD002168993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61696