Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5901 - 5920 of 6239
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Suarez de Guerrero v. Colombia
Suarez de Guerrero v. Colombia CCPR/C/15/D/45/1979 Communication number s : 045/1979 Author: Pedro Pablo Camargo on behalf of the husband of Fanny Suarez de Guerrero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Colombia Submission date 05 JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/45/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/674/en-US
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/614/2014 Communication number s : 614/2014 Author: Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar represented by counsel Robert James de Vere McCaw Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/614/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2254/en-US
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015 Communication number s : 2691/2015 Author: Leonid Sudalenko and Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Apr 2015 Date of decision 23 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3180/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/100/D/1354/2005 Communication number s : 1354/2005 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Nov 2004 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1354/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1133/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010 Communication number s : 1992/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Apr 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Right to be JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1914/en-US
Surgan v. Belarus
Surgan v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010 Communication number s : 1969/2010 Author: Taras Surgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 28 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2011/en-US
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US
T.E.A. v. Spain
T.E.A. v. Spain CRC/C/89/D/50/2018 Communication number s : 50/2018 Author: T.E.A. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 89 Country Spain Submission date 03 Aug 2018 Date of decision 08 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/89/D/50/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3003/en-US
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T.Ç. and M.E.Ç. v. Georgia
T. . and M.E. . v. Georgia CAT/C/70/D/861/2018 Communication number s : 861/2018 Author: T. . and M.E. . Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 70 Country Georgia Submission date 15 Feb 2018 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/70/D/861/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3424/en-US
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy ITA 30/09/2016 00:00:00 08/02/2018 14:24:52 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation: Refusal to grant a residence permit for family reason to a same sex foreign partner due to the treatment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45551
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/722f6192-8f4b-40f4-887f-806ca882cedd
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 23/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right to family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a domestic judgment ordering that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59929
TAYLOR-SABORI v. the United Kingdom
TAYLOR SABORI v. the United Kingdom GBR 22/01/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Interception of messages sent to the applicant s pager by the police as part of a covert surveillance operation covert audio EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3035