Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6041 - 6060 of 6239
Thirtheenth Activity Report (2020-2022)
Thirtheenth Activity Report 2020 2022 ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 2022 05 19 2022 09 27 Restricted ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 31 May 2022 13th Activity Report of the ACFC 1 June 2020 31 May 2022 Text as adopted at the 75th Plenary on 19 May 2022 Foreword by the FCNMACFC/DOC/(2022)8_addhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=13th_Activity_Report_2020_2022
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010 Communication number s : 1995/2010 Author: Elizabeth Gail Hickey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 14 Feb 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1858/en-US
Thomas (Samuel) v. Jamaica
Thomas Samuel v. Jamaica CCPR/C/65/D/614/1995 Communication number s : 614/1995 Author: Samuel Thomas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Jamaica Submission date 05 Jan 1995 Date of decision 31 Mar 1999 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/614/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/766/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010 Communication number s : 1966/2010 Author: Tija Hero Ermina Hero Armin Hero represented by counsel Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1966/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1889/en-US
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal
Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015 Communication number s : 2560/2015 Author: Tikanath and Ramhari Kandel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2560/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2721/en-US
Titiahonjo v. Cameroon
Titiahonjo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/91/D/1186/2003 Communication number s : 1186/2003 Author: Dorothy Kakem Titiahonjo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Cameroon Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 26 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1186/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1359/en-US
Tolchin v. Belarus
Tolchin v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/3241/2018 Communication number s : 3241/2018 Author: Andrei Tolchin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 12 May 2017 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3241/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3578/en-US
Tolchina et al. v. Belarus
Tolchina et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2857/2016 Communication number s : 2857/2016 Author: Ekaterina Tolchina et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 25 Mar 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2857/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3176/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
Topozov v. Kyrgyzstan
Topozov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/131/D/2700/2015 Communication number s : 2700/2015 Author: Mayrambek Topozov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 24 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2700/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3237/en-US
Traoré v. Ivory Coast
Traor v. Ivory Coast CCPR/C/103/D/1759/2008 Communication number s : 1759/2008 Author: Zoumana Sorifing Traor Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Ivory Coast Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1759/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1226/en-US
Truong v. Canada
Truong v. Canada CCPR/C/77/D/743/1997 Communication number s : 743/1997 Author: Ngoc Si Truong Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Canada Submission date 26 Apr 1996 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/743/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1035/en-US
U.G. v. Belgium
U.G. v. Belgium CRC/C/85/D/34/2017 Communication number s : 034/2017 Author: U.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Belgium Submission date 24 Jun 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/85/D/34/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2754/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-819
UNAL TEKELI v. Turkey
UNAL TEKELI v. Turkey TUR 16/02/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns violation of the right not to be discrimination against on gender grounds because of the refusal of the authorities to allow the applicant use her maiden EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37120
UNION DES ATHEES v. France
UNION DES ATHEES v. France FRA 11/01/1995 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Discrimination and freedom of association: Discriminatory treatment due to the fact that the applicant association was prevented by law from receiving a legacy. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32899
UNITED KINGDOM: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UNITED KINGDOM: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1 NULL 2014 07 07T00:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 8 July 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3b196667-02e2-4a48-a45d-8edb7cc8bfa8