Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1581 - 1600 of 1955
O.M. v. Ukraine
O.M. v. Ukraine CEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015 Communication number s : 087/2015 Author: O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2655/en-US
O, P, Q, R and S v. Sweden
O P Q R and S v. Sweden CCPR/C/134/D/2632/2015 Communication number s : 2632/2015 Author: O P Q R and S Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jun 2015 Date of decision 15 Mar 2022 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2632/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3141/en-US
P.F. and M.F. v. France
P.F. and M.F. v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016 Communication number s : 2780/2016 Author: P.F. and M.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country France Submission date 14 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3292/en-US
P.H.A. v. Denmark
P.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013 Communication number s : 61/2013 Author: P.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3453/en-US
P.K. v. Canada
P.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003 Communication number s : 1234/2003 Author: P.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 05 Dec 2003 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: On 5 December 2003 Canada was JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1346/en-US
P.S.S. v. Canada
P.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/21/D/66/1997 Communication number s : 066/1997 Author: P.S.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Canada Submission date 05 May 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/66/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/242/en-US
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PRT/CO/5 6 NULL 2013 12 22T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PRT/CO/5 6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 23 December 2013 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/PRT/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1104307a-de13-4100-adf2-60f241c8bc5c
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/PRT/CO/18 19 NULL 2023 05 24T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/PRT/CO/18 19 International Convention on Distr.: General 24 May 2023 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/PRT/CO/18-19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6235f860-3e49-4c28-b0d7-84da3454e3e5
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 Communication number s : 210/1986 225/1987 Author: Earl Pratt Ivan Morgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1986 Date of decision 06 Apr 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/210/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/308/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
R.C. v. France
R.C. v. France CCPR/C/109/D/1923/2009 Communication number s : 1923/2009 Author: R.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country France Submission date 04 Aug 2009 Date of decision 28 Oct 2013 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1923/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1680/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R.H.M. v. Denmark
R.H.M. v. Denmark CRC/C/86/D/83/2019 Communication number s : 83/2019 Author: R.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Apr 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCRC/C/86/D/83/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3565/en-US
R.K.B. v. Türkiye
R.K.B. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010 Communication number s : 028/2010 Author: R.K.B. represented by counsel Ozge Yildiz Arslan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country T rkiye Submission date 14 Jul 2009 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1720/en-US
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596