Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 70
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN 43611/11 LOVEDAY D. SWE 3/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Iran No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iran ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22341/09 THRILLING I. GBR 11/6/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for home Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD002234109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114244
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POHARNOK B. HUN 3/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Expulsion Prevent unauthorised entry into country Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172091
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58243/00 GASK A. GBR 7/1/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Sections 1 10 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 Sections 2 5 and 16 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD005824300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87207
CASE OF LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LUSTIG PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 31417/96 32377/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Army Act 1955 Air Force Act 1955 Naval Discipline Act 1957 Sexual ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58407
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992