Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 501 - 520 of 972
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Turkey
Government comments on the first report on Turkey TUR 1998 11 28 1999 11 09 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Turkey ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRITUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta MLT 2013 06 20 2013 10 15 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI in accordance with its country ECRIMLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine UKR 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Ukraine ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIUKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENG
Grioua v. Algeria
Grioua v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004 Communication number s : 1327/2004 Author: Messaouda Grioua n e Atamna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Oct 2004 Date of decision 10 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1367/en-US
Gruca v. Poland
Gruca v. Poland CCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012 Communication number s : 2183/2012 Author: Gruca Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 114 Country Poland Submission date 15 Apr 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1956/en-US
Gryb v. Belarus
Gryb v. Belarus CCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004 Communication number s : 1316/2004 Author: Mecheslav Gryb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Belarus Submission date 09 Jul 2004 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1225/en-US
H.S. v. Australia
H.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010 Communication number s : 2015/2010 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1925/en-US
Hany Khater v. Morocco
Hany Khater v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/782/2016 Communication number s : 782/2016 Author: Hany Khater represented by Mr. Rachid Mesli Alkarama Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 14 Nov 2016 Date of decision 22 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/782/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2692/en-US
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004 Communication number s : 1306/2004 Author: Erlingur Sveinn Haraldsson and rn Sn var Sveinsson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Iceland Submission date 15 Sep 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1375/en-US
Harminder Singh Khalsa et al. v. India,Switzerland
Harminder Singh Khalsa et al. v. India Switzerland CAT/C/46/D/336/2008 Communication number s : 336/2008 Author: Harminder Singh Khalsa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country India Switzerland Submission date 18 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCAT/C/46/D/336/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/55/en-US
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico CCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018 Communication number s : 3259/2018 Author: Irma Leticia Hidalgo Rea Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Mexico Submission date 15 Jan 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3227/en-US
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/82/D/931/2000 Communication number s : 931/2000 Author: Raihon Hudoyberganova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 1999 Date of decision 05 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/931/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/977/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Bangladesh and Azerbaijan
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2013 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Bangladesh and Azerbaijan. Abdul Hannan Permanent Representative of Bangladesh to the United Nations Office at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-bangladesh