Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 7963
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Aster v. Czech Republic
Aster v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007 Communication number s : 1575/2007 Author: Herman Aster Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Feb 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1478/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
Béatrice Marin v. France
B atrice Marin v. France CCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008 Communication number s : 1793/2008 Author: B atrice Marin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country France Submission date 05 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1575/en-US
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57849
BRAGA v. Russia
BRAGA v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis of decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49151
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012 Communication number s : 2137/2012 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1935/en-US
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014 Communication number s : 2416/2014 Author: Bakytgul Suleymenova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 10 May 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2787/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Bazarov v. Uzbekistan
Bazarov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/87/D/959/2000 Communication number s : 959/2000 Author: Saimijon and Malokhat Bazarov alleged victim s parents Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Nov 2000 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/959/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1274/en-US