Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8021 - 8040 of 8833
REPORTOF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE QUESTION OF THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE TO SELF-DETERMINATION : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO CHILE
REPORTOF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE QUESTION OF THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE TO SELF DETERMINATION : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO CHILE A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 NULL 2008 02 04T06:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6e9ed456-9024-4cd1-b718-bfcf0084b6c3
RESSEGATTI v. Switzerland
RESSEGATTI v. Switzerland CHE 13/10/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of civil/criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms in that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4718
RIEPAN v. Austria
RIEPAN v. Austria AUT 14/02/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing as the trial concerning incidents which occurred in prison was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-883
RIOLO v. Italy
RIOLO v. Italy ITA 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of a university teacher for defamation of a politician following the publication of an article in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44593
RIZOS AND DASKAS v. Greece
RIZOS AND DASKAS v. Greece GRC 27/08/2004 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction to pay damages for defamation and insult of a publisher and an editor of a daily newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22290
ROLAND DUMAS v. France
ROLAND DUMAS v. France FRA 15/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation following publication of a book in which a former defendant described his own trial. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32256
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia MKD 12/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the Pension and Disability Fund s decision to discontinue payment of the applicant s retirement pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55031
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
RUIANU v. Romania
RUIANU v. Romania ROU 17/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to execute final and enforceable court decisions due to various deficiencies in regarding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13077
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to render the decision to prolong the applicant s confinement to a secure institution within the time limit provided for by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4477
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
Rached Jaïdane v. Tunisia
Rached Ja dane v. Tunisia CAT/C/61/D/654/2015 Communication number s : 654/2015 Author: Rached Ja dane represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL and Action des chr tiens pour l abolition de la torture ACAT France Type of decision: Decision on merits JUTBCAT/C/61/D/654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2283/en-US
Rafael Rodríguez Castañeda v. Mexico
Rafael Rodr guez Casta eda v. Mexico CCPR/C/108/D/2202/2012 Communication number s : 2202/2012 Author: Rafael Rodr guez Casta eda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Mexico Submission date 25 Oct 2012 Date of decision 18 Jul 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2202/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1676/en-US
Rafik Belamrania v. Algeria
Rafik Belamrania v. Algeria CCPR/C/118/D/2157/2012 Communication number s : 2157/2012 Author: Rafik Belamrania Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Algeria Submission date 09 May 2012 Date of decision 27 Oct 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2157/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2159/en-US
Rahaman v. Canada
Rahaman v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/2810/2016 Communication number s : 2810/2016 Author: Mozibor Rahaman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 13 Sep 2016 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2810/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3198/en-US
Rahma Abdi-Osman v. Switzerland
Rahma Abdi Osman v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/76/D/122/2017 Communication number s : 122/2017 Author: Rahma Abdi Osman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Nov 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/122/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3039/en-US
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002 Communication number s : 1090/2002 Author: Tai Wairiki Rameka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country New Zealand Submission date 09 Mar 2002 Date of decision 06 Nov 2003 JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1090/en-US
Raosavljevic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Raosavljevic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/89/D/1219/2003 Communication number s : 1219/2003 Author: Vladimir Raosavljevic Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 03 Jul 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1219/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1344/en-US