Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 8833
BENJAMIN AND WILSON v. the United Kingdom
BENJAMIN AND WILSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/12/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Absence of a right to bring proceedings to review the lawfulness of detention on mental health grounds due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2474
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BOCELLARI AND RIZZA v. Italy
BOCELLARI AND RIZZA v. Italy ITA 02/06/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Impossibility to request a public hearing in proceedings for the application of preventive measures aimed at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44459
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s prosecution for having distributed leaflets indicating that certain political candidates EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2434
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57849
BRAGA v. Russia
BRAGA v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis of decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49151
BREGVADZE v. Georgia
BREGVADZE v. Georgia GEO 17/01/2019 00:00:00 28/01/2019 17:04:43 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings and lack of a remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51231
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of a suspect s defence rights due to the presence of a police officer during the first consultation with his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2596
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUKTA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BUKTA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 17/10/2007 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Freedom of assembly: Disproportionate restriction due to disbanding of a peaceful assembly solely because of the absence of the requisite prior notice without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11322
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. San Marino
BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. San Marino SMR 18/02/1999 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Unlawful interference due to the obligation for parliamentarians to take an oath on the Gospels on pain of forfeiting their seats. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11184
BUSCEMI v. Italy
BUSCEMI v. Italy ITA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair custody proceedings concerning the applicant s daughter due to the Youth Court President s public statements justifying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45104
BYKOV v. Russia
BYKOV v. Russia RUS 03/10/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Unlawful interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the lack of specific and detailed regulations providing for adequate safeguards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13645
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012 Communication number s : 2137/2012 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1935/en-US
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014 Communication number s : 2416/2014 Author: Bakytgul Suleymenova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 10 May 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2787/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Barzhig v. France
Barzhig v. France CCPR/C/41/D/327/1988 Communication number s : 327/1988 Author: Herve Barzhig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country France Submission date 09 Sep 1988 Date of decision 11 Apr 1991 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/41/D/327/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/547/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US