Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 5245
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013 Communication number s : 2316/2013 Author: Arslan Dawletow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 01 May 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3101/en-US
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/80/D/917/2000 Communication number s : 917/2000 Author: Karina Arutyunyan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Mar 2000 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Under rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/917/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1099/en-US
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014 Communication number s : 2508/2014 Author: Dodanpegamage Asantha Aravinda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 31 Oct 2011 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3197/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
BEGU v. Romania
BEGU v. Romania ROU 15/06/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of property: Lack of sufficient justification for continued detention on remand and failure to decide on the applicant s demand for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16321
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/10/2017 00:00:00 09/10/2017 10:54:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to erroneous dismissal of the applicant s constitutional appeal following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47887
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BLANDEAU v. France
BLANDEAU v. France FRA 01/12/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of right of access to the Conseil d Etat due to the omission to notify in due time two decisions rejecting appeals made EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33287
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BOL/CO/4 NULL 2022 06 01T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BOL/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 2 June 2022 Civil and Political Rights English Original: Spanish Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BOL/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7f7ca432-1e16-40cf-b9ca-87aa01c584b0
BORGOVAN v. Romania
BORGOVAN v. Romania ROU 30/11/2021 00:00:00 03/12/2021 09:55:36 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings brought by the applicant against a bar association due to divergent domestic courts case law concerning the access to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58975
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US