Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3621 - 3640 of 3779
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010 Communication number s : 2016/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2028/en-US
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015 Communication number s : 2535/2015 Author: Lukpan Akhmedyarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2860/en-US
M.D. AND M.A. v. Belgium
M.D. AND M.A. v. Belgium BEL 19/04/2016 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of the deportation of a Russian couple of Chechen origin to the Russian Federation failure to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1260
M. G. v. Germany
M. G. v. Germany CCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006 Communication number s : 1482/2006 Author: M. G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Germany Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: A request for interim measures was JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1435/en-US
MAKSIMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to free legal assistance in cassation proceedings before the Supreme Court due to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32182
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic courts to examine the proportionality of the interference with the applicants property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32248
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 26/09/1996 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of Jehovah s witnesses for having used a private place for meetings prayers and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22122
MARES v. the Czech Republic
MARES v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/01/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair adversarial hearing before the Constitutional Court in criminal proceedings due to the non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6248
MARTINS CASTRO ET ALVES CORREIA DE CASTRO v. Portugal
MARTINS CASTRO ET ALVES CORREIA DE CASTRO v. Portugal PRT 10/09/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of effectiveness of a compensatory remedy action in tort against the State available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9247
MATTEI v. France
MATTEI v. France FRA 19/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due due to the requalification of the charges against them at a belated stage of the proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32212
MCNAMARA v. the United Kingdom
MCNAMARA v. the United Kingdom GBR 12/01/2017 00:00:00 26/01/2017 14:24:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45899
MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. France
MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. France FRA 26/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial before the Cour de cassation in criminal and civil proceedings due to the failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33013
MIGON v. Poland
MIGON v. Poland POL 25/09/2002 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of adversarial proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the prolongation of detention on remand since neither the accused nor his counsel EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17741
MILATOVA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
MILATOVA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/09/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing and infringement of defence rights in property restitution proceedings and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6126
MOROZ v. Ukraine
MOROZ v. Ukraine UKR 18/09/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Freedom of religion / protection of family life and correspondence: Unlawful interference with freedom of religion due to the seizure of his religious literature and items as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46997
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012 Communication number s : 2221/2012 Author: Mahmud Hudaybergenov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2062/en-US
Matkarim Aminov v. Turkmenistan
Matkarim Aminov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2220/2012 Communication number s : 2220/2012 Author: Matkarim Aminov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2220/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2182/en-US
Meiers v. France
Meiers v. France CCPR/C/72/D/831/1998 Communication number s : 831/1998 Author: Michael Meiers Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country France Submission date 11 Feb 1997 Date of decision 16 Jul 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/831/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/923/en-US
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011 Communication number s : 2124/2011 Author: Mohamed Rabbae Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Nov 2011 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2153/en-US
Morales Tornel et al. v. Spain
Morales Tornel et al. v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1473/2006 Communication number s : 1473/2006 Author: Isabel Morales Tornel Francisco Morales Tornel and Rosario Tornel Roca Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 17 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1473/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1496/en-US