Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 2847
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Amirov v. Russian Federation
Amirov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006 Communication number s : 1447/2006 Author: Abubakar Amirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2006 Date of decision 02 Apr 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1503/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012 Communication number s : 2212/2012 Author: Andrei Sannikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Jul 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2488/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014 Communication number s : 2508/2014 Author: Dodanpegamage Asantha Aravinda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 31 Oct 2011 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3197/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
BEGU v. Romania
BEGU v. Romania ROU 15/06/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of property: Lack of sufficient justification for continued detention on remand and failure to decide on the applicant s demand for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16321
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BEN/CO/3 NULL 2020 03 27T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BEN/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 27 March 2020 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BEN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b68e7215-1425-47f7-8e10-d635cfd970d2