Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 2629
B. v. Romania (no. 2)
B. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 19/05/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of adequate legal protection of the applicant on the occasion of her psychiatric confinements as from 2000 and during proceedings which led to maintaining the measure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13089
BADOIU v. Romania
BADOIU v. Romania ROU 25/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: This case concerns ill treatment during an identity check carried out by a police patrol on a public highway in 2010 and the ineffective investigation into this event. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52334
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
BERGMANN v. the Czech Republic
BERGMANN v. the Czech Republic CZE 27/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to adopt all measures reasonably expected to safeguard the applicant parents rights in the context of disputes regarding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6346
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BIERSKI v. Poland
BIERSKI v. Poland POL 20/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: Authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to take measures re establishing father s contact with his incapacitated adult son resulting in the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62538
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRUNNER v. Poland
BRUNNER v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented in the leading EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55581
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland CERD/C/91/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 053/2013 Author: Benon Pjetri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: Opinion non JUTBCERD/C/91/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2186/en-US
Buckle v. New Zealand
Buckle v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/858/1999 Communication number s : 858/1999 Author: Margaret Buckle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 21 Sep 1998 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/858/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/905/en-US
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/38/D/298/2006 Communication number s : 298/2006 Author: C.A.R.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jun 2006 Date of decision 18 May 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/38/D/298/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/92/en-US
C. N. v. Denmark
C. N. v. Denmark CAT/C/57/D/709/2015 Communication number s : 709/2015 Author: C. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No Future sessions Country Denmark Submission date 28 Oct 2015 Date of decision 29 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/709/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2121/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 34098/11 GUZMAN M. SWE 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Somalia 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145789
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019