Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 4516
A.M. v. Switzerland
A.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/841/2017 Communication number s : 841/2017 Author: A.M. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Sep 2017 Date of decision 15 Nov 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/65/D/841/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2475/en-US
A.N.M. v. Sweden
A.N.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/60/D/677/2015 Communication number s : 677/2015 Author: A.N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 60 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Jul 2014 Date of decision 05 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/677/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3431/en-US
A.N. v. Switzerland
A.N. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/742/2016 Communication number s : 742/2016 Author: A.N. represented by counsel Centre Suisse pour la D fense des Droits des Migrants Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2447/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND ISL 2019 06 21 2019 06 26 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Iceland to implement the pending recommendations issued in the GRECOGrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English Committee UHRICEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d87f0f54-695a-4507-ba62-448fc975f8f2
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
AMALIIO IKOTROFIO THILEON v. Greece
AMALIIO IKOTROFIO THILEON v. Greece GRC 18/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant assosiation s right to a fair trial on account of the long period of time elapsed between the delivery in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55399
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
ARLEWIN v. Sweden
ARLEWIN v. Sweden SWE 01/06/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:39:23 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the obligation under Article 6 of the Convention to provide the applicant with effective access to court to obtain protection against alleged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2062
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AYDOGAN AND DARA RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI v. Turkey
AYDOGAN AND DARA RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 02/07/2018 00:00:00 02/08/2018 10:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the judicial authorities refusal to issue EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49963
Abdelkader Boudjema v. Algeria
Abdelkader Boudjema v. Algeria CCPR/C/121/D/2283/2013 Communication number s : 2283/2013 Author: Abdelkader Boudjema Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Algeria Submission date 18 Jun 2013 Date of decision 30 Oct 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2283/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2350/en-US