Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6081 - 6100 of 6129
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/49/Add.1 from 8 December 2017 to 15 December 2017 7 December 2018 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ghana United UNSPA/HRC/39/49/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f49%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X v. Hungary
X v. Hungary CCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016 Communication number s : 2901/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Hungary Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3285/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X. v. the Republic of Moldova
X. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 30/11/2021 00:00:00 03/12/2021 09:55:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference on account of the inclusion of information about the applicant s past convictions in his criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58963
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569