Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2821 - 2832 of 2832
Y. v. Switzerland
Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/431/2010 Communication number s : 431/2010 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/50/D/431/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/10/en-US
YAMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YAMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 15/05/2018 00:00:00 26/07/2018 10:34:58 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of proceedings lasted for nearly eight years and six months at two levels of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49897
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003 Communication number s : 1205/2003 Author: Zinaida Yakupova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 08 Oct 2003 Date of decision 04 Apr 2008 Comment: Under rule 92 JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1411/en-US
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005 Communication number s : 1410/2005 Author: Denis Yevdokimov and Artiom Rezanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Mar 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1609/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/35/D/238/2003 Communication number s : 238/2003 Author: Z.T. No.2 Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Norway Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 14 Nov 2005 Comment: The author s previous communication JUTBCAT/C/35/D/238/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/128/en-US
Z.Y. v. Kazakhstan
Z.Y. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/134/D/2849/2016 Communication number s : 2849/2016 Author: Z.Y. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Jul 2016 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2849/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3148/en-US
Zhaslan Suleimenov v. Kazakhstan
Zhaslan Suleimenov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/119/D/2146/2012 Communication number s : 2146/2012 Author: Zhaslan Suleimenov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 14 Jan 2011 Date of decision 21 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2146/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2261/en-US
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US
v. Switzerland
v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/147/1999 Communication number s : 147/1999 Author: Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCAT/C/26/D/147/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1769/en-US
v. Trinidad and Tobago
v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/64/D/752/1997 Communication number s : 752/1997 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/752/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1783/en-US