Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3381 - 3400 of 3623
Chen v. China,Netherlands
Chen v. China Netherlands CCPR/C/94/D/1584/2007 Communication number s : 1584/2007 Author: Meng Qin Chen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country China Netherlands Submission date 04 Apr 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1584/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1459/en-US
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Estonia
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Estonia EST GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 005 20 February 2002 GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 005 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Comments of the Government of FCNMGVT/COM/INF/OP/I(2002)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_Estonia_en
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Germany
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Germany DEU GVT/COM/II 2006 003 Strasbourg 7 February 2007 GVT/COM/II 2006 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF FCNMGVT/COM/II(2006)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=2nd_Com_Germany_en
Concluding observations on the fourth periodic report of Madagascar
Concluding observations on the fourth periodic report of Madagascar CCPR/C/MDG/CO/4 NULL 2017 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the fourth periodic report of Madagascar 1.The Committee considered the fourth periodic report of Madagascar UHRICCPR/C/MDG/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/239f2405-e998-4a66-ae55-94bcbe40002e
Conclusions 2014 - Ireland - Article 5
Conclusions 2014 Ireland Article 5 IRL 05 00 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Ireland as well as of the information contained in the previous report ESC2014/def/IRL/5/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/IRL/5/EN
Conclusions 2016 - Andorra - Article 1-2
Conclusions 2016 Andorra Article 1 2 AND 01 02 000 09/12/2016 12/12/2016 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESC2016/def/AND/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2016/def/AND/1/2/EN
Conclusions 2018 - Malta - Article 5
Conclusions 2018 Malta Article 5 MLT 05 00 000 24/01/2019 25/03/2019 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Malta. It already examined the situation with regard to the right to organise ESC2018/def/MLT/5/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2018/def/MLT/5/EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Crippa et al. v. France
Crippa et al. v. France CCPR/C/85/D/993 995/2001 Communication number s : 995/2001 993/2001 Author: Gabriel Crippa Jean Louis Masson and Marie Joe Zimmermann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 01 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/993-995/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1230/en-US
D.B. v. Slovakia
D.B. v. Slovakia CEDAW/C/76/D/135/2018 Communication number s : 135/2018 Author: D.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Slovakia Submission date 04 Dec 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/135/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3036/en-US
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia CAT/C/60/D/573/2013 Communication number s : 573/2013 Author: D.C. and D.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Georgia Submission date 01 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/573/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3428/en-US
D.R. and J.S. v. Spain
D.R. and J.S. v. Spain CCPR/C/89/D/1213/2003 Communication number s : 1213/2003 Author: D.R. and J.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1213/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1349/en-US
DRAFT - OVA A.S. v. Slovakia
DRAFT OVA A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial on account of extraordinary appeals lodged by the Prosecutor General and allowed by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7721
Dashkouski v. Belarus
Dashkouski v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/2616/2015 Communication number s : 2616/2015 Author: Kiryl Dashkouski Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Nov 2014 Date of decision 01 Jul 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2616/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3486/en-US
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police (EuroCOP) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 83/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police EuroCOP v. Ireland Complaint No. 83/2012 IRL 05 00 000 06 02 000 06 04 000 21 00 000 02/12/2013 17/05/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v. Italy, Collective Complaint No. 58/2009
Decision on the merits: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions COHRE v. Italy Collective Complaint No. 58/2009 ITA 16 00 000 19 01 000 19 04 000 19 08 000 30 00 163 31 01 163 31 02 163 31 03 163 25/06/2010 21/10/2010 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-58-2009-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-58-2009-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération Générale du Travail Force Ouvrière (CGT-FO) v. France, Complaint No. 160/2018 and Confédération générale du travail (CGT) . France, Complaint No. 171/2018
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration G n rale du Travail Force Ouvri re CGT FO v. France Complaint No. 160/2018 and Conf d ration g n rale du travail CGT . France Complaint No. 171/2018 FRA 24 00 163 2022 03 23 2022 09 26 European Committee of Social ESCcc-171-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-171-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération Générale du Travail Force Ouvrière (CGT-FO) v. France, Complaint No. 160/2018 and Confédération générale du travail (CGT) v. France, Complaint No. 171/2018
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration G n rale du Travail Force Ouvri re CGT FO v. France Complaint No. 160/2018 and Conf d ration g n rale du travail CGT v. France Complaint No. 171/2018 FRA 24 00 163 2022 03 23 2022 09 26 European Committee of Social ESCcc-160-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-160-2018-dmerits-en