Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7781 - 7800 of 7815
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Georgia on Incriminations (Theme I)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Georgia on Incriminations Theme I GEO 2011 05 27 2011 07 11 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2010 12E Theme I Third GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-12E-Final-Georgia-173-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-12E-Final-Georgia-173-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Ireland Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Ireland Transparency of Party Funding Theme II IRL 2009 12 04 2010 01 25 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2009 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-4E-Ireland-Final-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-4E-Ireland-Final-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Latvia on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Latvia on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II LVA 2008 10 10 2008 10 23 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 10 October 2008 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-1E-Final-Latvia-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-1E-Final-Latvia-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Malta on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Malta on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II MLT 2009 10 08 2009 11 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 8 October2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2009 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-2E-Final-Malta-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-2E-Final-Malta-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Netherlands on ”Transparency of Party Funding” (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Netherlands on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II NLD 2008 06 13 2008 09 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 13 June 2008 Public Greco Eval III GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-8E-Final-Netherlands-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-8E-Final-Netherlands-PF-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Georgia
Third Opinion on Georgia GEO ACFC/OP/III 2019 002 2019 03 07 2019 09 05 ACFC/OP/III 2019 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Georgia 1 adopted on 7 March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Georgia_en
Third Opinion on Lithuania
Third Opinion on Lithuania LTU ACFC/OP/III 2013 005 2013 11 28 Strasbourg 10 October 2014 Public ACFC/OP/III 2013 005 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Lithuania adopted on 28 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2013)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Lithuania_public_en
Tikhonov v. Kazakhstan
Tikhonov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2551/2015 Communication number s : 2551/2015 Author: Dmitriy Vladimirovich Tikhonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2551/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3272/en-US
Tsarjov v. Estonia
Tsarjov v. Estonia CCPR/C/91/D/1223/2003 Communication number s : 1223/2003 Author: Vjatseslav Tsarjov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Estonia Submission date 14 Aug 2003 Date of decision 26 Oct 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1223/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1371/en-US
V.C. (deceased) v. Republic of Moldova
V.C. deceased v. Republic of Moldova CEDAW/C/76/D/105/2016 Communication number s : 105/2016 Author: Promo LEX Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 20 Jul 2016 Date of decision 09 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/105/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3041/en-US
V.M., G.M., S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden
V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/883/2018 Communication number s : 883/2018 Author: V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 31 Aug 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/883/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3370/en-US
V.X.N. and H.N. v. Sweden
V.X.N. and H.N. v. Sweden CAT/C/24/D/130 131/1999 Communication number s : 131/1999 130/1999 Author: V.X.N. and H.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2000 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/24/D/130&131/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/207/en-US
VISIT TO SWITZERLAND - REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION
VISIT TO SWITZERLAND REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION A/HRC/45/9/ADD.1 NULL 2020 07 07T00:00:00 WG Mercenaries United Nations UHRIA/HRC/45/9/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/093845d7-7886-4951-90cc-f2d7ede4610e
Vasilskis v. Uruguay
Vasilskis v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/80/1980 Communication number s : 080/1980 Author: Sergio Vasilskis alleged victim s brother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 03 Nov 1980 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/80/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/309/en-US
Vincent v. France
Vincent v. France CCPR/C/91/D/1505/2006 Communication number s : 1505/2006 Author: Jean Pierre Vincent Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 91 Country France Submission date 20 Jul 2006 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1505/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1373/en-US
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010 Communication number s : 1952/2010 Author: Vitaly Symonik represented by counsel Roman Kisliak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Dec 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1887/en-US
W.K. v. Canada
W.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013 Communication number s : 2292/2013 Author: W.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 23 Oct 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2442/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Winkler v. Austria
Winkler v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006 Communication number s : 1468/2006 Author: Hermann Winkler Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1382/en-US