Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9021 - 9040 of 9204
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia LVA 29/07/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings in which the applicant contested the authorities refusal to grant the necessary security clearance and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31176
TRICARD v. France
TRICARD v. France FRA 10/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court in criminal proceedings due to the application of rules relating to time limits for appealing on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33141
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006 Communication number s : 1481/2006 Author: Grant Tadman and Jeff Prentice Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 17 Nov 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1006/en-US
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria
Tahar Ammari and Toufik Ammari v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011 Communication number s : 2098/2011 Author: Tahar Ammari represented by counsel Nassira Dutour of the Collectif des Famillesde Disparus en Alg rie Coalition of Families of Disappeared Persons JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2098/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1912/en-US
Taous Azouz v. Algeria
Taous Azouz v. Algeria CCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008 Communication number s : 1798/2008 Author: Taous Azouz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Jul 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1796/en-US
Tarasova v. Uzbekistan
Tarasova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/88/D/1057/2002 Communication number s : 1057/2002 Author: Larisa Tarasova alleged victim s mother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Mar 2002 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1057/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1314/en-US
Taright et al. v. Algeria
Taright et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/86/D/1085/2002 Communication number s : 1085/2002 Author: Abdelhamid Taright Ahmed Touadi Mohamed Remli and Amar Yousfi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Algeria Submission date 05 Jan 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1085/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1264/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/677/1996 Communication number s : 677/1996 Author: Kenneth Teesdale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Mar 1995 Date of decision 01 Apr 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/677/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/953/en-US
Terrón v. Spain
Terr n v. Spain CCPR/C/82/D/1073/2002 Communication number s : 1073/2002 Author: Jes s Terr n Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 13 Feb 2001 Date of decision 05 Nov 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1073/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/976/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Azerbaijan ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Azerbaijan Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding AZE 2012 10 19 2013 01 08 Adoption: 19 October 2012 Public Publication: 8 January 2013 Greco RC III 2012 12E Third Evaluation Round GRECOGreco-RC-III-2012-12E-FINAL-Azerbaijan-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2012-12E-FINAL-Azerbaijan-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Croatia ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Croatia Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding HRV 2011 12 09 2011 12 19 Directorate General I Human Rights and Rule of Law Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate GRECOGreco-RC-III-2011-12E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2011-12E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Cyprus on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Cyprus on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II CYP 2011 04 01 2011 04 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 1 April 2011 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2010 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-9E-Cyprus-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-9E-Cyprus-PF-PUBLIC