Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 673
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. B. v. Sweden
A. B. v. Sweden CAT/C/54/D/539/2013 Communication number s : 539/2013 Author: A. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Mar 2013 Date of decision 11 May 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/54/D/539/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2043/en-US
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy CCPR/C/35/D/266/1987 Communication number s : 266/1987 Author: A.M. alleged victim s brother name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Italy Submission date 05 Nov 1987 Date of decision 23 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/266/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/386/en-US
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
Al-Rabassi v. Libya
Al Rabassi v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009 Communication number s : 1860/2009 Author: Mufteh Younis Muftah Al Rabassi represented by human rights organization Alkarama Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 16 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1840/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Asensi Martínez v. Paraguay
Asensi Mart nez v. Paraguay CCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005 Communication number s : 1407/2005 Author: Juan Asensi Mart nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Paraguay Submission date 26 Apr 2005 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1492/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
Busyo et al. v. Congo,Democratic Republic of the Congo
Busyo et al. v. Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/78/D/933/2000 Communication number s : 933/2000 Author: Adrien Mundyo Busyo Thomas Osthudi Wongodi Ren Sibu Matubuka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Congo JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/933/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1080/en-US
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/38/D/298/2006 Communication number s : 298/2006 Author: C.A.R.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jun 2006 Date of decision 18 May 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/38/D/298/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/92/en-US
CAPE VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAPE VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/CPV/CO/1 NULL 2017 01 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/CPV/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 January 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/CPV/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/522d1aad-fa37-400f-9fc5-42a3cfe425d9
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS 41903/10 41911/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD004190310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156264
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 47220/19 GLUSHKOVA T. KHAYMOVICH D. RUS 7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD004722019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210878
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA 55164/08 BEZBRADICA S. HRV 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Protetction against Domestic violence Act Article 215a of the Criminal Code 343 100 464 451 429 310 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD005516408https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101152