Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 194
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012 Communication number s : 2162/2012 Author: Arsen Ambaryan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 20 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2307/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA 25965/04 CHURKINA L. M. CYP RUS 1/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Request for strike out rejected Preliminary objection dismissed ratione loci Preliminary objection joined to the merits ratione materiae Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD002596504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96549
Dafnis v. Greece
Dafnis v. Greece CCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020 Communication number s : 3740/2020 Author: Andreas Dafnis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Greece Submission date 20 Apr 2020 Date of decision 19 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3678/en-US
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria CCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009 Communication number s : 1900/2009 Author: Fatima Mehalli represented by counsel the Collectif des familles de disparu e s en Alg rie Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Algeria JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1807/en-US
G.H. v. Hungary
G.H. v. Hungary CEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017 Communication number s : 114/2017 Author: G.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Hungary Submission date 23 Feb 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3037/en-US
Giri v. Nepal
Giri v. Nepal CCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008 Communication number s : 1761/2008 Author: Yubraj Giri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Jan 2008 Date of decision 24 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1664/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Grunov and Grunova v. Belarus
Grunov and Grunova v. Belarus CCPR/C/123/D/2375/2014 Communication number s : 2375/2014 2690/2015 Author: Aleksandr Grunov and his mother Olga Grunova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Belarus Submission date 08 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2375/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3433/en-US
Gyan Devi Bolakhe et al. v. Nepal
Gyan Devi Bolakhe et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/123/D/2658/2015 Communication number s : 2658/2015 Author: Gyan Devi Bolakhe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Nov 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2658/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2530/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Germany, Djibouti and Canada
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON 19 September 2013 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Germany Djibouti and Canada.Hans Heinrich Schumacher Permanent Representative of Germany to the United Nations at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-germany
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/25/50/Add.2 from 16 July 2013 to 19 July 2013 2 April 2014 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/25/50/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f25%2f50%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US