Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8861 - 8880 of 8934
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Iceland
X v. Iceland CCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016 Communication number s : 2818/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Iceland Submission date 24 Feb 2016 Date of decision 22 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos Manuel Santos JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3289/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016 Communication number s : 2729/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Feb 2016 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2127/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US